Ok, so two things:
1. 5.8 GHz as a higher output in FCC as the 2.4 GHz band has and it is most likely less disturbed by wifis!
2. Even 150m high, and 1500m away, in case there is a 10 meter high treeline in , lets say, 100m distance, and even if you COULD (binocular ;-) see the bird, the remote is 40-50cm down and may be obstructed! Actually, in this constellation, an 8m high tree would "move" in the LOS!
Calculate it with Pythagoras, it happens more often, as you think!
The "lifestream gone, but remote still on" is in my eyes a good sign for such disturbance: No bandwidth any longer.
So try again, with NO obstacle for at least 200 or more meter!
1. 5.8 GHz as a higher output in FCC as the 2.4 GHz band has and it is most likely less disturbed by wifis!
2. Even 150m high, and 1500m away, in case there is a 10 meter high treeline in , lets say, 100m distance, and even if you COULD (binocular ;-) see the bird, the remote is 40-50cm down and may be obstructed! Actually, in this constellation, an 8m high tree would "move" in the LOS!
Calculate it with Pythagoras, it happens more often, as you think!
The "lifestream gone, but remote still on" is in my eyes a good sign for such disturbance: No bandwidth any longer.
So try again, with NO obstacle for at least 200 or more meter!
Last edited: